by Nonje
Hello there all of you Descenters. I'm currentl playing my first campaign as OL against a 3 heroes team, this composed : a Healer,a Mage and an Explorer. When they choose the heroes, they mostly choose 'em "random" , trying just to not take twice the same class. So they ended up picking no warrior cause nobody wanted to play it.Now, in a couple of the act I scenarios, they lost mostly because nobody of em 3 had a good strenght point to face the strenght test (SUch as Death on the wings scenario where they couldn't remove rocks, and the interlude I, where they couldnt open the main door near to the river. This said, they asked me to restart the campaign cause, if they game keeps going on like these and their chance are lowered scenario after scenario cause they have no warrior, it's quite pointless. I couldn't argue, but i can't believe that non-picking a warrior can be this forcing, since the game is made even for less players games. Is it just me? Just a bad team? Or simply it's true that a warrior in the team is needed no matter what?
Enlighten me guys. They are , for sure, not heavy players but they are getting into and they don't really make big mistakes in the last plays we had, but the strenght- tests are really a pain.